Previously, it was assumed that Security for Expenses only covered the risk of a building owner halting work—either briefly or permanently—before the notifiable work was finished, thereby leaving the neighbouring building potentially unsafe.
Now, it is generally recognised that security can also be used to cover the risk of damage caused by the works, as well as other related costs that may arise.
While theParty Wall Act does not explicitly state what Security for Expenses should cover, it is generally accepted that it may include: